|
quat by Hardread [web]
[nfo]
|
||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
popularity : 58% |
|||||||||||||
alltime top: #54040 |
|
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
added on the 2003-03-03 16:43:48 by dipswitch  |
||||||||||||||
popularity helper
comments
it's cool tho'
Nah
too few iterations... check the one in rainbowstars/razor1911
how are these weird 3d outputted? No polys, no voxels, raytrace? Or what??? Slow, and only that in 4kb? Whatever. Get's the pig just for beeing interesting to me..
Actually, it is raytraced. Quaternions are much more complex than usual object, so it makes calculation very slow. Anyway it is realtime on an average computer ;)
You could see something similar in Jizz or Staf (I can't remember exactly).
The sceenshot shows the first iteration, but it goes up to the 5th and then loops the 4th. That is quite complex.
(the coder of this intro)
You could see something similar in Jizz or Staf (I can't remember exactly).
The sceenshot shows the first iteration, but it goes up to the 5th and then loops the 4th. That is quite complex.
(the coder of this intro)
the one in stash was not raytraced. (as could been seen from the flickering polies, caused by a mirrored triangulation table.. doh ;-))
anyway, thanks for crashing my machine :)
and spengler, i haven't seen anything that had the slightest connection with raytracing in rainbowstars :) ofcourse it could be me sight, letting down on me.
and spengler, i haven't seen anything that had the slightest connection with raytracing in rainbowstars :) ofcourse it could be me sight, letting down on me.
I've also builded this quaternion in my 64k intro called "weputs", but it almost looks the same ;)
superplek: a mirrored table would still be non-flickering.
no, it would *not*, sagacity. you still believe that? :) draw a square, probe the possible situations and find out why.
its ok
A 4K intro that is actually 27K and has a 700+K .dll file included in the archive. Now *that's* what I call pushing the limits of technology.
superplek: ofcourse it would, although you'd need to mirror the actual contents as well.
Looks like an isosurface raytracer, with no music, and a lot of artifacts.
Ah, and it's something like 760k under windows.
Anyway, I expect more than this from a 4k, sorry.
Ah, and it's something like 760k under windows.
Anyway, I expect more than this from a 4k, sorry.
thom: originally it a 4k Linux intro, but due to the organizers didn't have Linux installed, I had to port it rashly.
thom: now *that's* what I call an idiot.
ok
submit changes
if this prod is a fake, some info is false or the download link is broken,
do not post about it in the comments, it will get lost.
instead, click here !
on windows it is more like 27k...