fix me beautifull
category: general [glöplog]
\o/
There is a problem with this prod: please remove the duplicate comment https://www.pouet.net/prod.php?post=967246
Comments don't get deleted, especially not for reasons like that.
The follwing demos:
https://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=86920
https://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=93999
https://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=89690
Are remixes of:
https://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=108
I don't think I can request for related/remixed links using the edit request system, right?
https://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=86920
https://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=93999
https://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=89690
Are remixes of:
https://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=108
I don't think I can request for related/remixed links using the edit request system, right?
done.
There is a problem with this entry:
YUCS is short for Yugoslav Cracking Service, while there is a typo in your YUCS entry spelling it Yugoslave Cracking Service.
YUCS is short for Yugoslav Cracking Service, while there is a typo in your YUCS entry spelling it Yugoslave Cracking Service.
fixed.
old screenshot removed, not adding the suggested new one because it looks mangled
Is it possible to bulk change links? I've put everything from my old ftp server ftp://micksam7.com/ onto https://ftp.micksam7.com/ since all modern browsers have stripped out ftp support in recent years. There's a few dozen prods that still link to it I think.
17 links changed :)
done
For the prod "Return to CD" by Void, it would make much more sense to set the platform as Amiga OCS/ECS + Wild and the type as intro.
The prod is for Amiga CDTV (that is why wild is needed).
Can you fix that ? Thanks :-)
The prod is for Amiga CDTV (that is why wild is needed).
Can you fix that ? Thanks :-)
no that wouldn't make any sense
Could someone add this prod as the invitation for Black Valley 2023?
There is a problem with this prod: you may want to remove this.
done
there's no such category, you can use the automated edit request system to suggest changes to platform or category, most cables stuff goes under the javascript banner
Hello Guys. Is there any chance to add Atari 7800 platform to the pouet.net? There's more and more A7800 releases, and there is more to come this this year. I think this platform deserves to be added out of respect for the authors of the releases (intros/demos & games) I will be grateful for any answer.
The second thing - should the prod that was exhibited at the party and the after-party version was released after the party, should be in the same thread as party version or is it allowed to create a separate one with a link to the new version etc?
Thanks in advance for all replies.
Best regards to the entire POUET team.
The second thing - should the prod that was exhibited at the party and the after-party version was released after the party, should be in the same thread as party version or is it allowed to create a separate one with a link to the new version etc?
Thanks in advance for all replies.
Best regards to the entire POUET team.
Hi Grey,
Adding an A7800 category is technically possible but we're a bit reluctant to do it because we don't want to add more "(near) dead" platforms to the database. There's not so many productions for A7800 yet though, so the best recommendation I can give at this moment is to make a list with all A7800 prods, groups and parties. A good example of such a yet-to-be-approved list is the one for the vector-06c platform: https://www.pouet.net/lists.php?which=250. When Pouet staff comes to the conclusion that there is enough potential for a separate A7800 category we will add it, like we did with for example TIC-80 some time ago when it became clear via the list system that TIC-80 had enough potential for the future.
Concerning your second question, it depends a bit. If the after-party version is a final or fixed version of the same prod that was shown in the compo then it's best to update the existing prod's information on Pouet. However, if the party version was (for example) just a prototype of a single level with no music and the after-party version has 5 levels, full soundtrack and a menusystem that wasn't shown before, then it's also OK to make a new prod on Pouet for it. There's (intentionally) no strictly defined rule for when to choose which option, so in case of doubt, you're welcome to post links on this thread and we'll be happy to advise what option is to be preferred in that particular case.
Last but not certainly not least, I was really happy to see you post here on the site after the updates of the last few weeks. I hope your recovery will be swift and full, and would like to extend best of wishes to you, your family and your team.
Kind regards, havoc
Adding an A7800 category is technically possible but we're a bit reluctant to do it because we don't want to add more "(near) dead" platforms to the database. There's not so many productions for A7800 yet though, so the best recommendation I can give at this moment is to make a list with all A7800 prods, groups and parties. A good example of such a yet-to-be-approved list is the one for the vector-06c platform: https://www.pouet.net/lists.php?which=250. When Pouet staff comes to the conclusion that there is enough potential for a separate A7800 category we will add it, like we did with for example TIC-80 some time ago when it became clear via the list system that TIC-80 had enough potential for the future.
Concerning your second question, it depends a bit. If the after-party version is a final or fixed version of the same prod that was shown in the compo then it's best to update the existing prod's information on Pouet. However, if the party version was (for example) just a prototype of a single level with no music and the after-party version has 5 levels, full soundtrack and a menusystem that wasn't shown before, then it's also OK to make a new prod on Pouet for it. There's (intentionally) no strictly defined rule for when to choose which option, so in case of doubt, you're welcome to post links on this thread and we'll be happy to advise what option is to be preferred in that particular case.
Last but not certainly not least, I was really happy to see you post here on the site after the updates of the last few weeks. I hope your recovery will be swift and full, and would like to extend best of wishes to you, your family and your team.
Kind regards, havoc
Hi, I have tried to link our prod "Return to CD" to its Revision compo capture (that points to when the prod start) and named this link as "youtube (live compo)", but my request has not been approved.
I would like to understand why also because I have seen another prod approved and I can give you the id if needed.
Many thanks in advance.
I would like to understand why also because I have seen another prod approved and I can give you the id if needed.
Many thanks in advance.
what's that ID?