fix me beautifull
category: general [glöplog]
http://www.pouet.net/nfo.php?which=11125&f=4 - wrong infofile.
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=15553 << obviously a cracked game, plz delete.
dipswitch, now if you admins would fix *that*, that'd be something!
Damnitt, I'm not well in adding prods...
A new prod = EP answer to dipswitch :
1/ for narrow band internet access : for 56Kb modems and less
2/ for DSL / Cable / Broadband access
Please note they are different versions regarding GFX : low-speed is lower quality, but faster to download for 56 Kb modems.
Sites are invisible and will not be indexed by search engines.
Mind the pet shop boys song lyrics while reading :)
Note that these sites will be available for reading till 15 days after hugi 30 was released.
So be fast.
1/ for narrow band internet access : for 56Kb modems and less
2/ for DSL / Cable / Broadband access
Please note they are different versions regarding GFX : low-speed is lower quality, but faster to download for 56 Kb modems.
Sites are invisible and will not be indexed by search engines.
Mind the pet shop boys song lyrics while reading :)
Note that these sites will be available for reading till 15 days after hugi 30 was released.
So be fast.
In the FAQ,
Code:
should be replace bybody#www-pouet-net tr[cite="314159"],
body#www-pouet-net tr[class="cite-271828"]
{
display:none;
}
Code:
body#www-pouet-net tr[class="cite-314159"],
body#www-pouet-net tr[class="cite-271828"]
{
display:none;
}
For the benefit of those without Amigas:
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=3037
video here
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=5679
video here
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=10299
video here
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=3819
video here
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=1475
video here
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=3032
video here
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=4392
video here
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=403
video here
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=407
video here
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=8084
video here
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=1153
video here
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=411
video here
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=412
video here
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=7971
video here
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=9216
video here
And before you ask, yes, I'm aware this is sacreligious to at least someone. And I do feel sorry for Spoonwizard's bandwidth.
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=3037
video here
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=5679
video here
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=10299
video here
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=3819
video here
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=1475
video here
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=3032
video here
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=4392
video here
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=403
video here
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=407
video here
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=8084
video here
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=1153
video here
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=411
video here
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=412
video here
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=7971
video here
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=9216
video here
And before you ask, yes, I'm aware this is sacreligious to at least someone. And I do feel sorry for Spoonwizard's bandwidth.
Well, I thought I've added them "back than"... However, it's now done. And for the bandwith, I don't think that much users will use it at one time.
http://pouet.net/prod.php?which=3960
wrong prod type, it's a 4k
wrong prod type, it's a 4k
oh, and according to the ms01 results file varus ranked 2nd, not first as stated in its pouet info.
ps: scene.org awards added. some "problems":
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=8354 => -1 best demo nominee
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=7138 => -1 best demo nominee
2002 awards: merge 64k&4k to intro (http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=7424 was the only 4k)
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=10412 => -1 best soundtrack nominee
when not already done, don't forget the 1995 viewing tips.
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=8354 => -1 best demo nominee
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=7138 => -1 best demo nominee
2002 awards: merge 64k&4k to intro (http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=7424 was the only 4k)
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=10412 => -1 best soundtrack nominee
when not already done, don't forget the 1995 viewing tips.
ps: in the vein of the class attribute to identify the users, it could be interresting to add the level too. That way, it'd be faster for the visitors to change the presentation for any level of users. It'd result in something like :
Code:
And could help to : add a shit brick background for the annoyingusers, hide completely the fakeusers, highlight the moderators/gloperators ( to see who can fix a mistake )<tr class="cite-177 moderator">(...)
no need to hilight them, userlist.php already provides that kind of information.
http://pouet.net/prod.php?which=15643 - it's amiga ppc stuff.
keops: oh, thank you I forgot about the sorting feature on the userlist. But my request would provide a kind of automatic update. When a user is "promoted" you wouldn't have to check his/her level and add him/her in your custom CSS.
bah, who cares about who is gloperator and who isn't anyway? :)
When something needs to get fixed, people post their request here and some gloperator/admin/moderator will fix it. It's not like you could private msg them anyway (fortunately)
When something needs to get fixed, people post their request here and some gloperator/admin/moderator will fix it. It's not like you could private msg them anyway (fortunately)
Actually it seems the people who can really act on Pouet ( have access to the FTP and DB ) are the moderators. It's good to know to who a given request must be addressed.
You know, with GreaseMonkey it'd take few minutes to make a script to had a send mail feature to the gloperators/moderators. ;)
You know, with GreaseMonkey it'd take few minutes to make a script to had a send mail feature to the gloperators/moderators. ;)
i think he means he wants to distinguish the questions from the answers... i guess.
then again, those people read this thread almost every single day, no need to send them a personal message.
This thread is a good thing, admins/moderators/gloperators don't have to endure personal messages, pression and email reading/writing.
This thread is a good thing, admins/moderators/gloperators don't have to endure personal messages, pression and email reading/writing.
that's one of the reasons indeed.