fix me beautifull
category: general [glöplog]
magic: because you're blind as a bat
seriously...
seriously...
in all fairness, he's still banned so that notice doesn't really apply to him
@Gargaj: Can't we just get over it.. I am glad to do it myself again instead of requesting the obvious here.. In the mean time thank you for adding them..
noby: this is what magic actually sees:
you know you can add youtube links the same way you just added credits, right?
Tomoya: apparently you cant see what I can and cannot do anymore..
adding credits i cant do either.. Would you be so kind to add those ut links btw..
@Gargaj: again could you restore my account.. its been to long.. thank you..
adding credits i cant do either.. Would you be so kind to add those ut links btw..
@Gargaj: again could you restore my account.. its been to long.. thank you..
this prod (INFUSED BYTES diskmag #1) was released by Realm Of Illusion. Please add group to the prod.
Also it doesn't support GUS, so please live only MS-DOS as a platform.
Release date: april 1994.
Also it doesn't support GUS, so please live only MS-DOS as a platform.
Release date: april 1994.
this prod Infused Bytes #2 also was released by Realm Of illusion. Please add group to the prod.
There is a problem with this prod: The demozoo link that I've just added is wrong, please remove it.
Quote:
you know you can add youtube links the same way you just added credits, right?
now i do ;)
tomoya: fair enough, didn't know his handicap included any and all submits (or something..)
maali: what a feature
maali: what a feature
Should plain images really be here?
No? :)
yea i agree
A little problem with : http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=66699
I did a mistake, this is a Demo not a Dentro. Can you fix it ?
I did a mistake, this is a Demo not a Dentro. Can you fix it ?
I looked through the Commodore 128 releases and found a number of disturbances:
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=59584
That's a plain C128 demo, not a C64 one. Should be a C128 release not a "C64 release".
And:
http://www.pouet.net/prodlist.php?platform%5B%5D=Commodore+128
All the releases tagged with "(c128 compatible version)" are C64 releases only, only fixed to run on C128 aswell. If you tag anything C64 which works on C128 aswell as "C128 release", then almost all C64 releases are C128 releases too. So, these should be still C64 releases only, not C128 releases.
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=59584
That's a plain C128 demo, not a C64 one. Should be a C128 release not a "C64 release".
And:
http://www.pouet.net/prodlist.php?platform%5B%5D=Commodore+128
All the releases tagged with "(c128 compatible version)" are C64 releases only, only fixed to run on C128 aswell. If you tag anything C64 which works on C128 aswell as "C128 release", then almost all C64 releases are C128 releases too. So, these should be still C64 releases only, not C128 releases.
For this prod: http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=66703, I've set "combined 80k" as compo, but that should have been "combined 128k", is that possible to do?
The actual party site rules describes it as this:
128 Kb Commodore 128 Times Revisited
In 1990 we had the "3,5 Kb Commodore VIC 20 Times Revisited" competition where people could make anything using no more than 3.5 Kb (Atari ST only).
In 2000 we had the "64 Kb Commodore 64 Times Revisited" competition where people could make anything using no more than 64 Kb (any system allowed).
Now we have the "128 Kb Commodore 128 Times Revisited" competition where people can make anything using no more than 128 Kb (any system allowed).
(no in-browser productions, max 131,072 bytes storage allowed)
Jury members: Tim "Manikin of TLB" Moss, Stefan "Digital Insanity of TLB" Posthuma, Patrick "Mr Bee of OVR" Bricout and Georges "Gunstick of ULM" Kesseler
Thanks :)
The actual party site rules describes it as this:
128 Kb Commodore 128 Times Revisited
In 1990 we had the "3,5 Kb Commodore VIC 20 Times Revisited" competition where people could make anything using no more than 3.5 Kb (Atari ST only).
In 2000 we had the "64 Kb Commodore 64 Times Revisited" competition where people could make anything using no more than 64 Kb (any system allowed).
Now we have the "128 Kb Commodore 128 Times Revisited" competition where people can make anything using no more than 128 Kb (any system allowed).
(no in-browser productions, max 131,072 bytes storage allowed)
Jury members: Tim "Manikin of TLB" Moss, Stefan "Digital Insanity of TLB" Posthuma, Patrick "Mr Bee of OVR" Bricout and Georges "Gunstick of ULM" Kesseler
Thanks :)
hi.
as it seems, avatar icons possibly get randomly assigned upon joining. which seems to have happened to http://www.pouet.net/user.php?who=99657
who actually got assigned my annoyingly blinking avatar gif to his account, as briefly discussed in this thread
http://www.pouet.net/topic.php?which=10582
where it was made clear that it must be a glitch and was not done on purpose.
as it seems, avatar icons possibly get randomly assigned upon joining. which seems to have happened to http://www.pouet.net/user.php?who=99657
who actually got assigned my annoyingly blinking avatar gif to his account, as briefly discussed in this thread
http://www.pouet.net/topic.php?which=10582
where it was made clear that it must be a glitch and was not done on purpose.
That's by design, new users get a random avatar from the pool.
okay, now i learned something :-)
There is a problem with this prod: ...
I'm Zarchos and I never uploaded anything to Pouet to this day.
Archieforever was my pseudo on French forum Gamopat, and it appears sbdy decided to create this pseudo on Pouet for some stupid reasons.
I'm asking Pouet now to remove this.
If you don't read the thread 'Archimedes vs Amiga war' on Gamopat, you can't really understand the situation (and it was several years ago).
The comments posted by this 'Archiforever' are copies of my own comments on Youtube, exceptI wouldn't post the same comments here on Pouet than on Youtube.
The same applies to my own preview of a demo from 1992 (!Preview), posted by this same 'Archiforever' with my comments, without my approval.
Please see what you can do, although I must admit I've got other fish to fry and I imagine you feel the same way.
Regards,
Xavier Louis Tardy (Zarchos).
https://www.youtube.com/user/Archimedes75009/videos
I'm Zarchos and I never uploaded anything to Pouet to this day.
Archieforever was my pseudo on French forum Gamopat, and it appears sbdy decided to create this pseudo on Pouet for some stupid reasons.
I'm asking Pouet now to remove this.
If you don't read the thread 'Archimedes vs Amiga war' on Gamopat, you can't really understand the situation (and it was several years ago).
The comments posted by this 'Archiforever' are copies of my own comments on Youtube, exceptI wouldn't post the same comments here on Pouet than on Youtube.
The same applies to my own preview of a demo from 1992 (!Preview), posted by this same 'Archiforever' with my comments, without my approval.
Please see what you can do, although I must admit I've got other fish to fry and I imagine you feel the same way.
Regards,
Xavier Louis Tardy (Zarchos).
https://www.youtube.com/user/Archimedes75009/videos
done... bit sad to see 3 posts from mods but several requests untouched :/
zarchos:
we're not removing prods because you don't agree with comments written by another user.
if someone made a fake account and copied your posts that's not nice but also not against any laws.
of course you can add your own credit to the prod and then add "official" comments from the maker (purple background, once the credit is approved)
zarchos:
we're not removing prods because you don't agree with comments written by another user.
if someone made a fake account and copied your posts that's not nice but also not against any laws.
of course you can add your own credit to the prod and then add "official" comments from the maker (purple background, once the credit is approved)
There is a problem with this prod: ...
Seems that the group "Bitlove" didn't get saved correctly. Can anybody help out with this please?
Seems that the group "Bitlove" didn't get saved correctly. Can anybody help out with this please?
There is a problem with this prod: ...
Also the compo category isn't 'website' but maybe something more in the line of 'pc demo' ?
Also the compo category isn't 'website' but maybe something more in the line of 'pc demo' ?