pouet 2.0 bugs me beautifull
category: general [glöplog]
Redhound found this article that might help with e.g. Chrome.
I keep getting this on my account page:
fixed
Sidenote: Gargaj, I know you're against all that open source shit anyway and stuff but would it really be SO hard to think about meaningful commit messages for 10 seconds each? :)
They seem fine to me. The people who are working on it haven't complained at least.
Code:
Warning: mysqli_connect(): (HY000/2002): Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket '/var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock' (2) in /home/hosted/pouet/sites/www.pouet.net/include_generic/sqllib.inc.php on line 13
Unable to connect MySQL: Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket '/var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock' (2)
This happens every now and then
Probably every time I restart the MySQL daemon :) We're still finetuning stuff, so sometimes things need to be restarted.
Here's a nice one. OHP demo, 4th place. The group name is out of whack. ;)
Bottom of http://www.pouet.net/cdc.php:
Quote:
Fatal error: Call to a member function RenderTypeIcons() on a non-object in /home/hosted/pouet/sites/www.pouet.net/cdc.php on line 85
tomaes: that <br> was added there as data by some brainiac because on the old pouet it worked in some places :D
redhound: fixed.
redhound: fixed.
Wish: from new to old Instead of from old to new. The comments underneath a prod. (just like on csdb)
"Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/hosted/pouet/sites/www.pouet.net/include_pouet/header.bare.php:7) in /home/hosted/pouet/sites/www.pouet.net/include_generic/functions.inc.php on line 217"
from http://www.pouet.net/submit_modification_request.php
from http://www.pouet.net/submit_modification_request.php
Quote:
Can`t add CDC.
It looks like the submit button on http://www.pouet.net/account.php doesn't submit?
It does here, maybe it's a problem with this?
When adding things such as credits via the automatic editing thingamajigger form, would it be possible to make the input auto-complete like the top does? It shouldn't prevent submission if different, unlike the top field, but if it had a few entries such as "Code", "Graphics", ... that would be nice.
I selected "add credits to a prod" and thought first "this is odd, why doesn't it say 'add credits' or 'add credits to this prod'" but really, second, "What am I supposed to put in this field?" I went and poked around until I found a prod that had credits already and then used what those said to enter "Code".
I think it might be easier for moderators working on approvals if they got bunches of "Code" and "Graphics" due to prompts by the auto-suggest than "programmer", "coder", "bit-banger", "artist", "paint splatterer", "moral support", etc.
Basically just relying on the power of suggestion.
This isn't exactly a bug, but it kinda confused me, and perhaps it would others because of the "just write whatever you want"-nature of plain input elements.
I selected "add credits to a prod" and thought first "this is odd, why doesn't it say 'add credits' or 'add credits to this prod'" but really, second, "What am I supposed to put in this field?" I went and poked around until I found a prod that had credits already and then used what those said to enter "Code".
I think it might be easier for moderators working on approvals if they got bunches of "Code" and "Graphics" due to prompts by the auto-suggest than "programmer", "coder", "bit-banger", "artist", "paint splatterer", "moral support", etc.
Basically just relying on the power of suggestion.
This isn't exactly a bug, but it kinda confused me, and perhaps it would others because of the "just write whatever you want"-nature of plain input elements.
If on the back-end the field actually happens to really be "whatever is put in by the person approving the changes", then doing this would also help promote naming convention consistency across productions.
Adding credits: If a person does not use pouet.net, unable to add anything?
eg. I was trying to add Mistral as Graphician to Adapt - refleXion
eg. I was trying to add Mistral as Graphician to Adapt - refleXion
I visit Pouet in Firefox or Chrome so I have no problems, but if you visit Pouet from IE10 (and presumably 11, etc.) it flags prod pages as linking to malware. I assume this is from all the crunched productions and the fact that the site links to a lot of things (most of which are downloads). As an end-user of the site I submitted a few for them to review, but the reality is that Gargaj or such need to select the other option (for site owners) and fill out all the appropriate information to whitelist everything, instead of a few specific pages.
Not everyone has the opportunity to use something other than IE, and unfortunate as it is, Pouet might get arbitrary visitors wondering what this place is (or being linked here to discover things) and happen to use IE by choice or ignorance. So it's probably worth fixing this, even if only for the principle of it (that this site doesn't have malware).
Legend: At this point I don't think I want to include non-Pouet users, but that might change in the future - just purely for database integrity purposes.
AMcBain: How exactly do we "fix" this?
AMcBain: How exactly do we "fix" this?
Gargaj: Demodays has an 'interactive' compo, which we don't have yet. Closest thing is Gamedev, but the winner is not a game, but some data display thing. Could you add the compo type?
Done - thank Redhound for replacing PHPMyAdmin with Adminer and thus speeding up raw SQL fiddling tenfold :D
Thanks. Great work, guys. :)
Quote:
by Gargaj:
AMcBain: How exactly do we "fix" this?
There's a page IE10 offers to take you to for reporting false positives and on that page there's an option for site owners to input contact info and such with notes as to whether it affects more pages, etc. Just visit that, go through the process, and hope.
However I just tried on a different computer with IE11 and I'm not seeing the warning ... perhaps it's already gone (I can check again tonight) or is only a problem in IE10.
gargaj: not a biggie but is there any plan to replace "merged groups"? our group renamed and is in the database under both names (459 and 6433) with different prods. on pouet 1.0, prods for both groups would appear under both (if i recall correctly). it would be kinda nice to have that again, so just wondering :)