pouët.net

Revision 2012

category: parties [glöplog]
Quote:
So I just checked real carefully and I came to a shocking conclusion: Revision is NOT scenepoints™ certified! In that light I'm not sure I can enter my release there.

Don't know what I'm talking about? Visit www.scenepoints.me today!


From their website:
Quote:
How do I know a Demoparty is a certified SCENEPOINTS partner?

That's easy. Just look for the button displayed here. Only Demoparties with this logo are official authorized SCENEPOINTS partners.

So we just have to include that image to squash Paralax' anxiety? Now that's an easy one!
added on the 2012-04-02 12:30:38 by Y0Gi Y0Gi
(And yeah, I'm aware that it was posted on 1st of April.)
added on the 2012-04-02 12:32:47 by Y0Gi Y0Gi
Quote:
(And yeah, I'm aware that it was posted on 1st of April.)

Scenepoints is much older than April 1st, so no, it's not a joke.
Im all for a VIP Area at the big parties where entrance is only permitted for people with at least 1k scenepoints.
added on the 2012-04-02 15:23:17 by wysiwtf wysiwtf
Small reminder for the musicians taking part in the exe newskool music compo :

Please add a WAVE writer to your entry ! Command line switches = win !

(over the size limit that way ? you can put multiple files in your archive - one with writer and one without it, sticking to the sizelimit)
added on the 2012-04-02 16:06:19 by franky-- franky--
Wouldn't an mp3 in the archive be just as fine? Yeah, I know it would be possible to do postprocessing etc. that way, but it's pretty easy to compare and disqualify entries trying to abuse this.
added on the 2012-04-02 16:35:00 by Punqtured Punqtured
What Punqtured said
added on the 2012-04-02 16:37:49 by Puryx Puryx
So we have now arrived at the point where mp3 delivers sufficient quality even for the musicians themselves when they have another choice, eh? :)
added on the 2012-04-02 16:41:44 by kb_ kb_
kb_ oh no... not again.. pleeeeaaaase :D
added on the 2012-04-02 17:00:04 by Puryx Puryx
Not what again? :)
added on the 2012-04-02 17:23:58 by kb_ kb_
Punqtured: What exactly is the difference between CopyMemory(pDsoundBuffer...) and WriteFile(hWav...)? ;)
added on the 2012-04-02 17:42:19 by Gargaj Gargaj
kb_: the mp3 vs xyz format discussion
added on the 2012-04-02 18:16:45 by Puryx Puryx
.MOD > .MP3
added on the 2012-04-02 18:23:02 by djh0ffman djh0ffman
LIVE > VINYL > CD > TAPE
MY SINGING > *
added on the 2012-04-02 19:00:46 by ___ ___
MP3 Downloading is Killing home taping!
added on the 2012-04-02 19:07:42 by djh0ffman djh0ffman
rasmus has leading.
added on the 2012-04-02 19:16:56 by styx^hcr styx^hcr
mp5>mp4>mp3
.MKV > .OGG
added on the 2012-04-02 19:27:22 by magic magic
hee magic, nu je er toch bent.. kom je ook nog ff in saarbrucken langs?
added on the 2012-04-02 19:28:49 by havoc havoc
... no, I know what you want me to say, but no, too obvious.
kaneel > mp3
added on the 2012-04-02 19:33:50 by xylo xylo
Kb_: You're right. But I mean ... It's an executable music compo ... I'm sure the slight quality loss won't be audible to most and will definately not make any difference on the outcome of the voting. Changing nick would have way more impact ;)

Gargaj: The difference being either what you suggest, or code for the other prod ... Right now, I prefer the latter :-p
added on the 2012-04-02 20:09:05 by Punqtured Punqtured
i vote that all competing at revision exe music compo takes a name permuted from "punqtured"
Surely if you're capable of making an mp3 of your exe music entry, you either: a) have a wav writer you can give to the organisers, or b) are doing something faintly ridiculous with audio cables that rather nullifies the point about sound quality...?
added on the 2012-04-02 20:37:30 by gasman gasman

login