fix me beautifull
category: general [glöplog]
It would be nice if the submit prod page listed the size restrictions on the screen shot and the .nfo file as well as the pixel dimension restriction on the screen shot.
The dates on the parties page are listed in a strange order. I was expecting oldest to newest (i.e. 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001) or newest to oldest (2001, 2000, 1999, 1999) but it seems to be some sort of odd combination of both: 2000, 2001, 1998, 1999.
its design
no, its dezin. design is what legalize is asking for :)
no, what he is asking for is logical progression.
disruptive logic == design
anyways, i'll look at it tomorow when im sober
disruptive logic == design
anyways, i'll look at it tomorow when im sober
For the dates, I just realized it is sorted by the last two digits of the year: 00, 01, 97, 98, 99.
For the submit page, its just nice to know the restrictions before you submit it and it says your nfo file is too big.
Additionally, on the prod page it would be nice to be able to add the group name if it isn't yet specified. Some older demos don't have a proper NFO file that gives the group name, you have to run it in order to identify the group, but you can't run it unless you have a GUS card, etc.
For the submit page, its just nice to know the restrictions before you submit it and it says your nfo file is too big.
Additionally, on the prod page it would be nice to be able to add the group name if it isn't yet specified. Some older demos don't have a proper NFO file that gives the group name, you have to run it in order to identify the group, but you can't run it unless you have a GUS card, etc.
Group 'Zuul desing' should be 'Zuul design'
Hrm... now I find conflicting info... some say "desing" and some say "design". I can't tell if its a consistent typo or an intentional munging :-)
"Zuul Desing" is an "intentional munging".. like Melon Dezign with the z.
i thought "desing" is a verb :D
rich: no shit? :)
dude, seriously, if you dont know who did a prod, dont submit it.
as for the rest, i'll waste 15 minutes making it better documented now.. hold on..
as for the rest, i'll waste 15 minutes making it better documented now.. hold on..
here we go.. parties.php seems to be sorted properly now..
my thumb on http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=12837 should be down, not up. :)
All thumb ups on http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=12821 should be down.
ps tell it to the people who write the .nfo files
how many infofiles have you came across that didnt fit the limits exactly?
Please remove http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=12836, will put a final version up some time.
my logos aint in the loop! fix it!
all thumbs up for kosmoplovci! fix it!
ravity: no, but i'll replace the download url when the final is here.
shutup you wankers. go submit missing prods and results instead :)
shutup you wankers. go submit missing prods and results instead :)
Submit missing prods?
Now thats the best thing I've read in the 496 responses to this thread.
Now thats the best thing I've read in the 496 responses to this thread.
http://www.pouet.net/party.php?which=34&when=04
100% Coders groupname isnt shown.. (fuck torment mix 2004)... Intresting :)
100% Coders groupname isnt shown.. (fuck torment mix 2004)... Intresting :)
was using <? print($prods[$i]["groupname1"]); ?>
now is <?=$prods[$i]["groupname1"]?>
:)
now is <?=$prods[$i]["groupname1"]?>
:)
and some people wonder why pouet is slow :D