missing link found
category: general [glöplog]
Quote:
47 MILLION-YEAR-OLD FOSSIL CHANGES HUMAN HISTORY
University of Michigan professor says the discovery of a 47 million-year-old fossil may be from a primate species related to humans, apes and monkeys.
Michigan paleontology Professor Philip Gingeric, who also serves as the president-elect of the Paleontological Society of the United States, said the newly discovered fossil also supports the adapid theory of evolution, The Wall Street Journal said Monday.
A major ongoing evolutionary debate is focused on whether humans descended from an ape-like group called the tarsidae, the known descendants of the modern Asian primate tarsier, or the adapidae, whose modern descendant is Madagascar's lemur.
Gingeric said the new fossil offers evidence for the latter and traditionally less accepted theory.
http://www.upi.com/Science_News/2009/05/18/Fossil-find-may-be-monkey-human-ancestor/UPI-19881242660948/
The cult of education and circular reasoning zomg .... lulz..a fossil of a RAT. These guys got nothing to do, they have to use up their grant money and pretend they are doing something worthwhile for humanity. So they find an enlarged rat fossil and it's the fucking missing link.
I found this stone in my backyard.
It may have been the wheel from Fred Flintstones car!, now hand me my degree and more importently...grant money. yay!
here is another missing link. id been looking for the damn thing for ages
http://z0r.de/?id=182
http://z0r.de/?id=182
We have known the missing link on these part for ages:
So many threads to pouetize lately!
pouet does not need pouetizing, it allready is!
CrossProduct: Star with the stupid ones GO GO GO!
yeah kittens as the missing link. makes as much fucking sense as what the eggheads came up with.
We all know adok is the missing link.
Deus , dont you have some mediocre shit to worry about?
CP, no we all just wish that he was..
If you want to make a critique try understanding what it is about, not just start with a picture and 6 sentences.
What are they wrong about, dont just use personal incredulity fallacy.
What are they wrong about, dont just use personal incredulity fallacy.
Ok, if you on the other hand will refrain from using Argumentum ad logicam, Argumentum ad verecundiam, Circulus in demonstrando, and in the context most importantly Cum hoc ergo propter hoc falacy. Thank you very much, you have no idea what I know, you assume, and it really does make an ass out of you.
soon it'll take half a gesture to get people into full blown drama mode
whoops Slippery Ad Slopium
whoops Slippery Ad Slopium
here eebliss, I found your missing link:
eebliss: i only asked you to get into details not spout the same unbacked shit i hear every fucking day from creationists.
yet, oddly enough i dont care anymore.
Oh well drama WEEE!
yet, oddly enough i dont care anymore.
Oh well drama WEEE!
WHERE IS SEX AREA?
you are right Decipher, I was looking for http://www.medem.com, how did you know? anyway cheers you clever rascal!
Deus, the thing is. The creationists have valid points. The point about the world being 6000 years old and that satan went around with a spade and dug down all these fossils, are not one of them though. :)
Creationists have valid points?
Wat?
Wat?
FAIL.