pouët.net

In the name of holy copyrights

category: general [glöplog]
 
This is something everyone has got to read.

http://forums.chiffandfipple.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=65900

Holy copyrights indeed!
Uhm... no? - go away!
added on the 2009-01-27 09:28:23 by Puryx Puryx
Louigi: sod off.
added on the 2009-01-27 10:16:27 by gloom gloom
Short summary plz. I don't want to click something that could be a last measure or similar.
added on the 2009-01-27 10:20:55 by El Topo El Topo
There are two forum pages and not a lot to read at all - it took me less than a minute to read it all.
Brief summary - copyright issues concerning church music and whether church service is a public performance that should go under copyrights so that churches can be sued.
Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn.

BB Image
churches should be illegal!
added on the 2009-01-27 11:15:38 by okkie okkie
tl;dr
added on the 2009-01-27 11:24:34 by Gargaj Gargaj
Careful okkie, before you know it you'll be sitting next to Geert in court ;)
church is the richest fukker around already anyway :/
I'm with okkie
added on the 2009-01-27 21:27:33 by iq iq
what about illegal churches?
BB Image
added on the 2009-01-28 00:06:31 by ham ham
What religion are we talking about here anyway?
does it really matter? at the end of the day the small differences they have pale in comparison to the huge -ridiculous- similarities.
added on the 2009-01-28 11:19:26 by NoahR NoahR
What? Like the total dismissal of intelligent FACTS? ;)

login