Random image thread
category: residue [glöplog]
*clac* *clac* *clac* lobster attack
this bickering does prove a point in the sense that supposedly stable and responsible people start behaving very inconsequently once things go outside their culturally dictated comfort zones... live kitten frying is evil personified, live lobster frying is fine cuisine... so it's worse to kill something that can be cuddled?
omg does she have ass in belly?
"find x" "here!"
"find x" "here!"
so people waste their time translating even joke pictures into their mother tongue :(
it's pouet dot net after all
Havoc even though this doesn't bear much discussing your basic premise is wrong, in that kittens approximate more than invertebrates our own personal insight into things that are happening, and other people even more. we'd expect a person to experience more horror than a kitten, and a kitten more than a lobster, and a lobster more than an amoeba but ANYWAY WHATEVER
i don't see your point Havoc - you're saying that because some abstract intellectual standpoint is possible, then by definition it is valid and anybody on a public forum should give a shit
this is essentially the most white and nerdy thing you can possibly do
i don't see your point Havoc - you're saying that because some abstract intellectual standpoint is possible, then by definition it is valid and anybody on a public forum should give a shit
this is essentially the most white and nerdy thing you can possibly do
forestcre: you have cats, right?
for some reason i see that picture as the missing link between okkie and truck!
hehehe i don't have cats i have motorbikes
Forestcre:
I think you mix up two things:
Only because a being cannot express its pain in a way you understand it does not mean it feels no pain.
So cooking a lobster alive is at least as horrible as burning a kitten.
You just don't realise it then.
I think you mix up two things:
Only because a being cannot express its pain in a way you understand it does not mean it feels no pain.
So cooking a lobster alive is at least as horrible as burning a kitten.
You just don't realise it then.
some useless random image thread stats
12,098 retrieverable unique images (10,178 JPEG, 1191 GIF, 717 PNG, 12 BMP)
4,568,798,149 pixels total
JPEG JFIF: 1.00: (170), 1.01: (5608), 1.02: (4091), N/A: (309)
PNG: interlaced: (12), non-interlaced: (705)
PNG colorspace: RGB: (423), RGBA: (119), indexed: (150) ,grayscale: (25)
PNG bits/color: 16bit: (8), 8bit: (681), 4bit: (25), 1bit: (3)
GIF version: 87a: (82), 89a: (1109)
filesize: min: (42), max: (13,706,538), avg: (119,396), med: (52,994)
image size (pixels): min: (1), max: (100,000,000), avg: (378,243), med: (203,490)
normalized median from all images scaled to 512x512 without filtering (yeah, i liked texel's work)
12,098 retrieverable unique images (10,178 JPEG, 1191 GIF, 717 PNG, 12 BMP)
4,568,798,149 pixels total
JPEG JFIF: 1.00: (170), 1.01: (5608), 1.02: (4091), N/A: (309)
PNG: interlaced: (12), non-interlaced: (705)
PNG colorspace: RGB: (423), RGBA: (119), indexed: (150) ,grayscale: (25)
PNG bits/color: 16bit: (8), 8bit: (681), 4bit: (25), 1bit: (3)
GIF version: 87a: (82), 89a: (1109)
filesize: min: (42), max: (13,706,538), avg: (119,396), med: (52,994)
image size (pixels): min: (1), max: (100,000,000), avg: (378,243), med: (203,490)
normalized median from all images scaled to 512x512 without filtering (yeah, i liked texel's work)
apparently quite many of those images are motivational posters judging by the borders visible in the above pic.
If you stare at the picture long enough you can see the jesus lightswitch... (And you will shit bricks)
Plz make random image movie with every pic as single frame kthx.
you do see jesus (or smth saint like at least) in it.. scary! :D
What's up with that cartoon text-bubble in the top? :P
snoutmate, could you do it by every 10 or 20 pages?
@rainmaker: yeah that was my original intent, i'm working on the video right now
@texel: i didn't save the original file names (and right now i don't feel about regetting that 2G of images), but i can do it for groups of x pictures (400?) sorted by file date, should be close enough
@texel: i didn't save the original file names (and right now i don't feel about regetting that 2G of images), but i can do it for groups of x pictures (400?) sorted by file date, should be close enough
H-XMAS :)