This Page Is Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional!
category: general [glöplog]
So?
I like pages that are written in valid HTML, it shows that someone actually knows what he/she is doing. Kudos to everyone who manages to generate valid HTML code!
I like pages that are written in valid HTML, it shows that someone actually knows what he/she is doing. Kudos to everyone who manages to generate valid HTML code!
Doing valid (x)html is neither hard nor absolute proof of a well done page. It's one step in the right direction though.
Valid pages could help speed up the rendering (a bit) and also assist in accessibility (f.e. screen readers). So kudos, that's good!
Albeit, using tables for the structure flushes the gained pro points for the validity so no kudos for you after all :)
Albeit, using tables for the structure flushes the gained pro points for the validity so no kudos for you after all :)
Quote:
Doing valid (x)html is neither hard nor absolute proof of a well done page
Well, you know those bastards who use <font> and all that other deprecated stuff for sure. Of course, it's easy, but people don't care. They rather use deprecated elements instead of some fine CSS.
oh, by the way:
Ampersands should be escaped as &!
Code:
<a href="party.php?which=43&when=2008">the gathering 2008</a>
Ampersands should be escaped as &!
Actually, I see <font> is used, as well as <center>. And of course, if you're really hardcore, you'll go for a strict doctype instead of transitional. :)
did some hack the dates for this thread? it sounds just like back in 2001!
ryg: \o/
ryg: still no RSS feed though :)
oh, like, wow.
Quote:
I like pages that are written in valid HTML, it shows that someone actually knows what he/she is doing. Kudos to everyone who manages to generate valid HTML code!
And now we'll just have to wait for the world where manufacturers actually care about the standards!
s/manufacturers/M$
make the shit work in browsers, that is good code. :)