320x200 is just stupid
category: general [glöplog]
@kb_
Ahh, but back when it was introduced as a standard VGA mode, who had a 16:10 monitor? ;-)
@tribão
Yeah. Its 56 better :D
Ahh, but back when it was introduced as a standard VGA mode, who had a 16:10 monitor? ;-)
@tribão
Yeah. Its 56 better :D
looks better than 640x200 (only atari makes that possible;)
320 x 200 - atari st low resolution.
fiveofive, cga mode 6: 640x200 bw, ega mode e: 640x200 16 colors.
hmm, wonder if 320x200 textmode works with fbdev..
hmm, wonder if 320x200 textmode works with fbdev..
216, wow, so respect .. ;) on atari st it is 4 colors btw
dodke: actually it's not 16:10 or 4:3, it's SOMETHING... depending on the system, TV standard (NTSC vs PAL) and whatthefuckever the pixel clock is set to. Pretty close to 4:3 tho in most cases, and EGA/VGA monitors displayed it 4:3ish, too :)
Still it got chosen because it fills the videomem almost up to a power-of-two boundary (8K to 64K depending on color depth) and because the necessary multiplication for addressing lines can be implemented with one 6-bit adder (and two shifts if it's not in hardware).
People started to think about aspect ratios in the VGA/VESA time when VRAM got cheap and suddenly the video modes' aspect ratios resembled the monitor's ;)
People started to think about aspect ratios in the VGA/VESA time when VRAM got cheap and suddenly the video modes' aspect ratios resembled the monitor's ;)
240x160 is by far the best resolution! 3:2 aspect ratio rulez! Also: GBA IS MEGABESTEST! BOW DOWN FOR IT'S SUPERIOR CPU AND LCD CONTROLLER! 240x160 MAKES IT POSSIBLE!
64k segment me beautiful.
kusma, there's something about it not using proper interlaced pal/ntsc like signals that makes me sad ;)
May i suggest 256x192 please?
1337x666 resolution would be the coolest actually.
320x200 is sexy at 50hz
eye^PaC: Nintendo DS has a GPU! THE SCENE IS DEAD!
320x200 - PC
320x240 - Amiga (who laughs at PC)
320x240 - Amiga (who laughs at PC)
320x256 - Best EVAR! nuff said none of this 320x200 NTSC crap, PAL for life!
1280x1024.. now there's a stupid resolution.
5:4? wth?
5:4? wth?
but they managed to plot more pixel with fullscreen!!1
1280 * 256...
320 * 512...
We're in glass houses, xeron :(
320 * 512...
We're in glass houses, xeron :(
"320x240 - Amiga (who laughs at PC)"
Amiga: 320x256 (PAL) or 320x200 (NTSC)
Amiga: 320x256 (PAL) or 320x200 (NTSC)
And if I remember correctly:
Hi-Res: 640x256 (PAL)
(Med-Res?): 320x512 (PAL)
Interlace: 640x512 (PAL)
Hi-Res: 640x256 (PAL)
(Med-Res?): 320x512 (PAL)
Interlace: 640x512 (PAL)
What's the fuzz with the square pixels anyways? I love wide CPC pixels =)
Rectangular pixels have feelings too :-(
I love wide Vic20 pixels...
@Influence Device
Don't diss 1280x256 and 320x512. Those resolutions are super awesome because AMIGA RULEZ.
BTW, do you have teh internets at home now?
Don't diss 1280x256 and 320x512. Those resolutions are super awesome because AMIGA RULEZ.
BTW, do you have teh internets at home now?