pouët.net

Finally, I do get be cloned. No problem for you, it's already past thing.

Considering people are really poor minded.

Brain volum is significant of memory capacity. Brain form is significant of intellectual capacity (or in certain case of autonomy).
Understanding is self-destruction.
Spelling usage of thinking is alienation.
Remembers too.
Emotions are alteration by chemical process. ("possession" of the person who provoque emotion)
Note that: possession is used to descibe magnetic exchange considering matter distribution and energy evolution.
Modeling of dreams are relative to the name of the files used in the demo "meeting with the creator"
Telepathic capacity is created with trust.

I'm the first human to do cloning on animals without violate the creation.

Do not trust popular dolly,dog cloning scientists when they pretend they did not do crime.

Do not trust human-rats when they pretend did not do cime.

Do not trust psychologists, they are criminals too.

Do not trust other human than human-cats because they do their god father vengeance. exemple: human-pigs cause acne.

Error of key hit (cime is intended for crime) I forgot the "r".

...who make me mistake this word...human-pigs or human-rats ?

So, do not trust human-rats when they pretend did not do crime.

Hi L.C.F., can you describe the inner mathematics lying in the fabrication and graphical representation of a vulva ?
I need this for my doctorate.

Sugar is the natural drug, that permits human in general to be possessed by their father or mother to learn basics.

Sugar alters transformation of food. Avoiding sugar consumption make you loose weights.

I am citizen of France, and my talks are the deductions of my thinking only.
My IQ equivalent represents a value of 400-500. It's tiring sometimes. But its means normal intelligence for 4-5 specialists in 100 or 200 years.
Or soon ?
I'm master of Informatics, Physics, Genetic, and Intelligence.
Physic rules the world.

4Mo lines of C++ in 5 years. (http://barti.tlk.fr/ link to 3DMB)
Eugenism, and method of representation. (reserved)
Real theory of magnetism. (CNRS)
Real theory of brain. (brievly)
Jesus Christ proof. ( http://laurentcance.free.fr/ )
The method to calculate that E<>mc². (Chaos Theory)

my email adress: laurentcance@orange.fr

I do not accept SPAMS.

Chaos theory is the calculation of error of Hazard Theory.

The butterfly is in fact totaly in submission of Tsunami, relatively to the example presented in Jurassic park)

The stone found in GB with marks have value to the proof of containing only the eye of dinosaur, and so a proof of telekinesis.

Method of calculation are presented on my website, without altering your mental capacity.

Alchemy experiments have to be supervised by cats (the only species that bring discernment capacity)

Stochastics are simple to be calculated.
(Chapter IV of my 1st part of book at http://barti.tlk.fr/)

The AI in About section of 3D MESH BLACKSMITH can help to maintain high intellectual state, considering understanding.
Explanation in french:

"intrications sur la majoration de l'erreur sur le calcul spectral d'évolution"

The modeling of real theory of magnetism can be only done by me.
The steps of my thinkings are only saved in my memory unities.

Another fake correction : quantic dreams of Sliders TV series are incitation pedagogy of learning physics.

A secret: the only way to proceed to fantastic creation is geometry.

My websites:

http://barti.tlk.fr/
http://laurentcance.free.fr/
http://l.cance.free.fr/

My initials are L.C.F.

Eating cats is criminality, trying to violate them is also criminality.

Do not try to slunder me anymore, I have the only keys to know the how section.

I will not give in this site the proof of my natural cloning, neither other misc stuffs.

Contact me to my email, with your real email.

Note of personalization: my studies of immortality stuffs are closed, with success. (started in 80's)

Good luck to recreate my time exploration machine. (cf. my websites)
Good luck to not fall in the bad ideas of bad minded people about this.

"Future is the only thing that can be changed." L.C.F.

I think, it's closed for me to present of truths to not make mistakes.
Do not harass me anymore with your poor minded idea.
You believe in what you believe and I prove what I say, alone.

Ok. Another mistake caused by people slundering. Telepathic stuffs are relative to mimetism.

Stop pretentions, please.

L.C.F. PLEASE READ THIS POST CAREFULLY BEFORE WRITING ANYTHING ELSE.

What you are doing right now is writing many pages, and making many claims. However, your writing here is ineffective, because no one here believes or understands a single thing that you are saying. I presume that the reason you write is so that others will understand what you are saying and believe you.

So, this is what you should do: Take just ONE claim, like for example "Telepathic capacity is created with trust", and spend a lot of time, step by step, trying to prove that ONE statement to us. If you could prove to others that telepathy exists, that would be a major breakthrough. You would be one of the most famous people in history.

Right now, the amount of claims you are making is a lot. But claims are not important. Anyone can make claims. The amount of new facts you've added to general human knowledge is ZERO. You need to focus on proving just one thing, until other people understand and agree with your proof. You aren't accomplishing anything with your current method of flooding us with hundreds of "empty" claims (claims with no corresponding proof).

If you are scientific in thinking, then you should already have this careful step-by-step proof available. Otherwise, you wouldn't believe these things yourself in the first place. One of the most important parts of being a scientist is that you never believe anything with complete certainty until it is proven.

In your attempts to prove these facts to others, you may discover that you never had any good reason to believe these things in the first place. If that's the case, that's OK. You can decide to be less certain about those beliefs. You are allowed to change your mind.

It is true that a person shouldn't completely trust psychologists. John Nash had a similar condition to yours, and psychologists did nothing but torture him by injecting him with various poisons that never cured him. John Nash eventually cured himself by deciding not to believe in his own "delusional hypotheses", as he called them.

It is quite possible that you hallucinate a lot. You should seriously think about whether that's happening to you. Most people hallucinate at least a bit. It's a natural part of the way human perception works. Some people hallucinate a lot more than others. For example, some people hallucinate voices. I hallucinate voices sometimes when I am very sleepy, but not while I'm awake. John Nash, who I mentioned earlier, had auditory hallucinations just like that, all the time, while he was awake. He had to spend a lot of time trying to learn to tell the difference between real voices and fake voices.

Ok, so, you must try to not believe what I wrote, you must try to not understand what I wrote, if it's please you.

Helping others do not cause pains.

Reality is overrated.

let him keep on writing, it's useful for those design overlays with unreadable text in our next demo.

Hey that's exactly what i was doing !
Illegal telepathy !

nono.. that is wrong. A scientists does not prove things. A scientist comes up with a hypothesis and then tries to disprove it. That is a huge difference.

I haven't accused you of doing anything wrong or causing pain. I'm simply pointing out that your writing here will not have the effect you want (assuming that you actually want to teach others about your discoveries).

I would like to understand what you wrote. I'm trying to understand, but you also have to try to be understandable. I've already studied a lot of other essays, papers, books and other works by a lot of very smart authors. I have had no problems understanding those. If you can write a proper, clear essay, then surely I'd be able to understand it.

Why would you conclude that the reason I can't understand you, is that it pleases me to not understand? Here are some facts:

1- I understand a lot of other authors easily, on very complex subjects.
2- No one understands your essays well enough to be convinced by them (as far as I can tell by responses here).

It would clearly be my fault if I had problems understanding many other authors (which I don't), and if many people could successfully understand your essays (which they don't).

The reason I don't believe what you write, is not because it pleases me to disbelieve. It's because you have not successfully shown any reason to believe that anything you've written is true. Have you written anywhere in detail a proof that telepathy exists? Is it hidden somewhere in one of the books of L.C.F.? I suggest you dedicate an entire essay or paper to carefully prove that telepathy exists. It should be written such that anyone intelligent would read it and would have to agree with you. If not, then don't bother saying that telepathy exists, because people won't believe you. Everything we see every day reaffirms that telepathy does not exist. It would take a very careful proof, and/or lots of evidence, to convince us that telepathy does exist.

Just so you know-- if you can prove that telepathy exists, you can get a million dollars. http://www.randi.org/research/index.html

If you're still reading, then I have an important thing for you to think about. Imagine that it was discovered that in 1903, someone had actually written and published that E=mc^2. That's two years before Einstein published the same equation. Would you say that the person who wrote it in 1903 is the real genius, deserving of Einstein's legendary fame, and that Einstein was just a huge fake?

A lot of people would say "yes", and maybe you too. You may be surprised to learn that someone actually did write the equation in 1903. His name was Olinto De Pretto.

So why isn't De Pretto considered one of the most important geniuses of all time? Because when he said E=mc^2, he just blurted it out as a speculation. He didn't prove that E=mc^2. So, even after he said it, people had no reason to believe it. Even though he said it, E=mc^2 could not be added to our scientific knowledge.

Einstein, however, didn't just blurt out that E=mc^2, he PROVED that E=mc^2. That's why he's the genius. He wrote, step by step, carefully so that anyone intelligent could follow, and agree with him, exactly why E=mc^2. So that we could safely add E=mc^2 to our scientific knowledge.

Einstein was a cousin of mine, and I told you that E=mc² is false.

## ILLEGAL TELEPATHY EXECUTED ##

ok, so E != mc².

would you please tell us how it's right?

1. You do not are the owner of demo concept.

2. You loose time spending searching something to preserve yours.

3. You forget to talk to the good person.

4. You must learn french to read the http://barti.tlk.fr/tldp/index.html

5. Witnesses are reals, not fashions.