pouët.net

i'm so annoyed why is it the big boys always come along and think they are the first or the best

i'm really pissed off about this
http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/12/19/features/gallery.php

compared to this which is the original! but we havent got the clout that saatchi has...fucking eeeerrrggghhh!!!! THOUGHT UP IN 1987 BEFORE EVEN BRITART
[url]http://www.studentsart.com[url]

it looks like a 1987 site aswell

yes its supposed to

it will need a new back end which someone here has offered to do the coding etc...thanks...
just needs a server really...and then lots of publicity
its been slow to grow because its been all manual but then it has also been free server too!!!
but i am annoyed that saatchi has jumped in calling it his brainchild

the saatchi stuart site front end is puke!

fuckings to stewart

Compared to stuart, your site looks absolutely horrible. Art site with photoshopped logos that a ten-year old (or even me) could do?

stuart looks terrible compared to studentsart.com dont make me laugh...
a ten year old did do the logo with junk machine
its actually java not photoshop

here is the stuart copycat gallery http://www.saatchi-gallery.co.uk/stuart/
theyve even copied our red blob/splash thing which we change every so often so it looks like a blob
THE BLOB

a) stuarts page is more usable (you dont have to click a flag, 'enter' first), plus it's like a rather default look hence that's a bonus too.
b) first someone needs a moment to get used to your awkward colorscheme let alone the amateurish look of it all doesnt come close to the stuart one.
c) if i'd have to choose ...
d) good luck with your brainchild.

Arent you just copycatting magics avatar?

prof.spok:well i wanted to jump up and down in a rant.. and yes i am always willing to help anyone cast a magic spell :)

and thanks for the luck maali

now i realist studentsart.com need to rise to the challenge with some fuck you artwork

better make that some eyefisting fuck you artwork.. ^^