fix me beautifull
category: general [glöplog]
sorry... should I write it again with bbcode?
I hope now looks better:
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=8169
http://www.29740.com/ma/artcandy.zip
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=9095
http://www.29740.com/ma/au_Kilo.rar
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=20204
http://www.29740.com/ma/jwapg.rar
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=9798
http://www.29740.com/ma/kilomegagigaterapetaexademo.zip
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=8962
http://www.29740.com/ma/54.zip
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=12401
http://www.29740.com/ma/nofomofo.rar
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=22999
http://www.29740.com/ma/pig.zip
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=23209
http://www.29740.com/ma/pig2.zip
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=8647
http://www.29740.com/ma/theFreak.zip
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=26109
http://www.29740.com/ma/voxel.rar
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=8841
http://www.29740.com/ma/firedemowin32.zip
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=8169
http://www.29740.com/ma/artcandy.zip
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=9095
http://www.29740.com/ma/au_Kilo.rar
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=20204
http://www.29740.com/ma/jwapg.rar
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=9798
http://www.29740.com/ma/kilomegagigaterapetaexademo.zip
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=8962
http://www.29740.com/ma/54.zip
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=12401
http://www.29740.com/ma/nofomofo.rar
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=22999
http://www.29740.com/ma/pig.zip
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=23209
http://www.29740.com/ma/pig2.zip
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=8647
http://www.29740.com/ma/theFreak.zip
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=26109
http://www.29740.com/ma/voxel.rar
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=8841
http://www.29740.com/ma/firedemowin32.zip
It's just that we use the usual pouet interface with additional links/fields to change download links, screenshots, nfos, etc, so yes, it helps a lot when you do it 20 times a day or more.
Anyway, it's done ;)
Anyway, it's done ;)
Thanks so much keops :)
nanook: fakeuser thing is to avoid double votes and such.. i would need to merge you with texel and 30002 to change your level on this one.. O_o
ps, forget it if it is too many effort. May I create a new user? I might use texel account, but I don't remember the password...
In the "we like" section :
Demovibe button's url to be changed to :
http://www.demovibes.org
Thanks !
Demovibe button's url to be changed to :
http://www.demovibes.org
Thanks !
Gonna entertain you for a couple of seconds:
Moving all amiga productions requiring a 68020+ and more than 512kb of chip memory while being labelled as ECS into the AGA category would be wise i think, it's not because they don't use the extra aga features / colors that they run on the real machines.
For example, it's unfair that this being referenced in the same category as this
As they don't require the same hardware (the later one even requiring a configuration that never existed afaik: ECS + 2mb chipram + 68020 is pure fantasy).
Those who wanna do it on oldschool amiga platforms should adapt to the rules that were in application when the shit was still hot and not bend them to their advantage because they can do jack shit with a simple 68000.
(the common rule, at least until 1994 was: a 68000 + 512kb chip + 512kb fake fast + an ECS chipset, the machine most commonly owned by amiga demosceners).
Or create a "UAE" category ;)
Moving all amiga productions requiring a 68020+ and more than 512kb of chip memory while being labelled as ECS into the AGA category would be wise i think, it's not because they don't use the extra aga features / colors that they run on the real machines.
For example, it's unfair that this being referenced in the same category as this
As they don't require the same hardware (the later one even requiring a configuration that never existed afaik: ECS + 2mb chipram + 68020 is pure fantasy).
Those who wanna do it on oldschool amiga platforms should adapt to the rules that were in application when the shit was still hot and not bend them to their advantage because they can do jack shit with a simple 68000.
(the common rule, at least until 1994 was: a 68000 + 512kb chip + 512kb fake fast + an ECS chipset, the machine most commonly owned by amiga demosceners).
Or create a "UAE" category ;)
http://pouet.net/prod.php?which=26134
proper link
https://cpu.untergrund.net/releases/!cpu_ducks_you.zip
proper link
https://cpu.untergrund.net/releases/!cpu_ducks_you.zip
bhead: done.
seems like cc06 orgs changed some links to their ftp... *sigh*
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=26187 is http://scene.org/file.php?file=%2Fparties%2F2006%2Fchaosconstructions06%2Fin64%2Faos-offworld.zip&fileinfo
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=26185 is http://scene.org/file.php?file=%2Fparties%2F2006%2Fchaosconstructions06%2Fdemo%2Fgaia.zip&fileinfo
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=26186 is http://scene.org/file.php?file=%2Fparties%2F2006%2Fchaosconstructions06%2Fdemo%2Frealshit.zip&fileinfo
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=26187 is http://scene.org/file.php?file=%2Fparties%2F2006%2Fchaosconstructions06%2Fin64%2Faos-offworld.zip&fileinfo
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=26185 is http://scene.org/file.php?file=%2Fparties%2F2006%2Fchaosconstructions06%2Fdemo%2Fgaia.zip&fileinfo
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=26186 is http://scene.org/file.php?file=%2Fparties%2F2006%2Fchaosconstructions06%2Fdemo%2Frealshit.zip&fileinfo
...
http://pouet.net/prod.php?which=26230
platform should be c64, type should be demo
sorry (i'm sure i entered them right but something happened!)
platform should be c64, type should be demo
sorry (i'm sure i entered them right but something happened!)
done
ltk_tscc: yes....
changed. the uae request for ps remains open.
@hitchhikr
What about "enter the dotmatrix". It was written on an Amiga 1500 with 68030 and fastmem. I don't think it *requires* fastmem, but it probably would crash without an 020. But it wasn't even written on an AGA machine.
What about "enter the dotmatrix". It was written on an Amiga 1500 with 68030 and fastmem. I don't think it *requires* fastmem, but it probably would crash without an 020. But it wasn't even written on an AGA machine.
done
Xeron: personally i've never seen an amiga 1500 (which wasn't available outside uk) but i remember the amiga 2500.
I think it'll be better to dispatch the amiga productions into 4 categories:
- Amiga 500/2000
(productions needing a 68000 + 512k of chipmem, OCS chipset)
- Amiga 500+/600
(68000 + 1mb of chipmem, ECS chipset)
- Amiga 1500/2500/3000
(68020 or more + 1mb or more chipmem, ECS chipset)
- Amiga 1200/4000
(68020 or more + AGA chipset).
A little bit like it's done for 16/32 bits atari prods which is a fair classification imho.
Also, i don't think there's many entries to change in the database, mostly post-uae ones needing funky hardware requirements.
I think it'll be better to dispatch the amiga productions into 4 categories:
- Amiga 500/2000
(productions needing a 68000 + 512k of chipmem, OCS chipset)
- Amiga 500+/600
(68000 + 1mb of chipmem, ECS chipset)
- Amiga 1500/2500/3000
(68020 or more + 1mb or more chipmem, ECS chipset)
- Amiga 1200/4000
(68020 or more + AGA chipset).
A little bit like it's done for 16/32 bits atari prods which is a fair classification imho.
Also, i don't think there's many entries to change in the database, mostly post-uae ones needing funky hardware requirements.
My bad, the amiga 1500 should be included in the amiga 500/2000 category as it seems it was just a 2000 repackaged.
teh done.