|
Shapes In A Plane by Fizzer
[nfo]
|
||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
popularity : 50% |
|||||||||||||
alltime top: #30383 |
|
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
added on the 2019-04-21 15:47:37 by 100bit  |
||||||||||||||
popularity helper
comments
256 bytes at revision thumbs:)
rulez added on the 2019-04-21 16:17:19 by sensenstahl 
i expected much more when i read "fizzer" :D welcome anyways =)
I must speedup your code! I have to see how good would have been...
Thanks for the motivation, everyone. =) So the story here is that I only tested this in DOSBox-X. I assumed that the real hardware would run it much faster, and I was so confident about this that I didn't go check it on the compomachine. So in the end, what was shown on the bigscreen wasn't really what I wanted to show.... Still, Sensenstahl caught me at the party and told me the most likely reason why it's so slow. So I will fix this up and make a final version. In the meantime, I'm adding the sourcecode as "NFO" here. Please all you 256b experts take a look and advise!
The only thing which can save you, is a sinus table. You should eliminate the FSINCOS and FSIN instructions, because of too much iterations (by one pixel).
An easy little speed bonus would be
to change the speed value from 100 to 0.01 and use DIVs instead of MULs.
(I don't beleive that a backbuffer could help you).
An easy little speed bonus would be
to change the speed value from 100 to 0.01 and use DIVs instead of MULs.
(I don't beleive that a backbuffer could help you).
*MULs instead of DIVs :)
I've had it with these shapes in a plane
ok
nice :)
ok
submit changes
if this prod is a fake, some info is false or the download link is broken,
do not post about it in the comments, it will get lost.
instead, click here !