| Ringz HD by Desire [web] | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
popularity : 54% |
|||||||||||||
alltime top: #15009 |
|
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
added on the 2016-05-17 19:04:44 by HellMood  |
||||||||||||||
popularity helper
comments
!!
rulez added on the 2016-05-17 19:07:42 by sensenstahl 
Hi-Res 256b!
Obviously slow on DosBox but still... looks really nice!
Obviously slow on DosBox but still... looks really nice!
Whoa!
...really cool, high res and not your usual tunnel
like!
This was really cool! My favorite from all the 256b entries.
HIREZ! :)
btw, totally screws up if screen pitch != 800 (matrox sucks :)
btw, totally screws up if screen pitch != 800 (matrox sucks :)
Nice! If circles had 2 steps of brightness instead of 3, the illusion of 3D rings would be almost perfect.
Hahaha, I wanted to propose the ring-zoomer, but is already DOES it =). And spins. Very good.
I think it will open a NEW challenge: 256b intros in Hi-Res.
I think it will open a NEW challenge: 256b intros in Hi-Res.
@Kuemmel: well, it's still too close to the usual tunnel ;)
@sim: I already did intros in even higher res (Descent 256b with music, Autumagic 256b ) but figured it's quite difficult to make it count, like, 1024x768 and then what? With particles you barely notice a difference. With fractal stuff and sloppy offsets, same thing. Apparently, lots of non-ortho straight lines and circles, combined with fine animation steps (0.25 here) and a slightly lower resolution to have something you can call FPS rather than SFP, are one way to do it =)
@sim: I already did intros in even higher res (Descent 256b with music, Autumagic 256b ) but figured it's quite difficult to make it count, like, 1024x768 and then what? With particles you barely notice a difference. With fractal stuff and sloppy offsets, same thing. Apparently, lots of non-ortho straight lines and circles, combined with fine animation steps (0.25 here) and a slightly lower resolution to have something you can call FPS rather than SFP, are one way to do it =)
@HellMood: what about 32bpp truecolor stuff in 256 bytes (like this)? :)
@wbc\\bz7: Until now, i didn't have an idea/concept for which i would need more than 256 colors (custom palette), also 400% plotting effort must be justified (1byte <-> 4 byte) Like for the higher resolution, it's not too easy to make it really count ... an easy case would be to have 256 shades instead of 64. Realistic shading of anything 3D related can of course be enhanced with true colors, but combined with Hi Res, it's not too easily been done either (performance & 256b limit) Maybe i'm biased towards less colors, since they told me that even Hi Res with only FOUR colors can look pretty realistic ;) Autumn 64b
So slick & smooth!
one of the most awesome 256b prods lately. very design, much wow.
should have won, IMHO.
should have won, IMHO.
It's quite hypnotic actually.
Very aesthetic.
Cool
:)
Just plain circles with naive colors.
Great!
ok
submit changes
if this prod is a fake, some info is false or the download link is broken,
do not post about it in the comments, it will get lost.
instead, click here !