|
col.or.
[nfo]
|
||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
popularity : 58% |
|||||||||||||
alltime top: #16247 |
|
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
added on the 2016-02-22 00:19:14 by nikq  |
||||||||||||||
popularity helper
comments
sorry I have selected PC64k wrongly but is PCdemo. fixme already reported.
added on the 2016-02-22 00:31:18 by nikq
The tech is probably pretty cool but sadly all it comes across as are random colored lines.
are those a bunch of rays you got there or are you just happy to see me?
I toyed with the original implementation some months ago, novel but nothing that got me exited. My impression is pretty much the same with this, except it isn't novel anymore. I would've at least liked to see some more elaborate scenes and graphics, and not just the same reference material as in the original one. Your texts are also rendered at a wrong aspect ratio. Unfortunately my thumb will go down.
Still hoping to see more from you in the future :)
Still hoping to see more from you in the future :)
looks interesting but lacks design and ideas, so somehow wasted potential here. music is okish. piggie (=
dichroic prism.
what q said.
@got A prism has amazing functionality which split light perfectly by wavelength. :)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dichroic_prism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dichroic_prism
i liked it somehow.
That's some really cool stuff and interesting tech. Nice a demo with a new look.
@noby and Gargaj: what's wrong with you folks? How is this meh or worth a thumb down when the majority of releases have next to no technical value or are redoing for the hundredth time stuff that was explained in lengths by mostly one guy years ago? I'm not saying that anything not technical is crap, but come on, a pure tech demo doesn't belong anymore?
@noby and Gargaj: what's wrong with you folks? How is this meh or worth a thumb down when the majority of releases have next to no technical value or are redoing for the hundredth time stuff that was explained in lengths by mostly one guy years ago? I'm not saying that anything not technical is crap, but come on, a pure tech demo doesn't belong anymore?
Zavie: As far as I can tell (and the info tells too), it's just a one-to-one port of this. I definitely would've at least piggied it if the implementation was completely original, but I already exhausted my interests with the original WebGL version months ago. Alternatively it would've been interesting to see some original or different graphics applied to the algorithm as well.
I'm also kind of on the same line as noby and gargaj. I expected a better show or see something new done with the technique. I'm not going to thumb down since this procution is not bad.
Welcome back :)
very nice , i could watch it much more longer
Could have used some more content as mentioned but it does have a certain style which I enjoyed. I liked the music toward the end.
more ray, more good
pretty much what Gargaj said
urk....
If this is a tech demo, it didn't convey that it was tech, or even a demo, in any way whatsoever. Don't just zip your dev folder. Make a demo.
submit changes
if this prod is a fake, some info is false or the download link is broken,
do not post about it in the comments, it will get lost.
instead, click here !