|
Woman by Hick'n'Hack [web]
[nfo]
|
||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
popularity : 62% |
|||||||||||||
alltime top: #49735 |
|
|||||||||||||
added on the 2009-04-13 15:22:21 by diver  |
||||||||||||||
popularity helper
comments
nice
rulez added on the 2009-04-13 15:26:10 by Queen_Luna 
wtf? girlie 2?
same shit different name
This time isn't even stereoscopic.
procedural graphics is not too procedural
as said
.
ok
bah
simple packed picture?
could be also generated by a 2d vector but the drawing itself (or a part) isn't procedural
nope
...
color me unimpressed.
no
well...
bah
I don't see what's wrong with it. It's an image, after all.
1 bit BMP?
They didn't even bother to clean up the image to gain some space/improve composition. Also, very uncreative and basically the very same thing they did last year too.
I think the part of the title you missed was 'procedural'.
crinkl0red bitmap or what?!
lame
no
epic fail
Real picture is something like 80x60=4800 pixels; since pic is 1 bit smoothed, the resulting image should be 4800/8=600 bytes. Executable is 2,8kb. WTF 2,2k of image depacking routine?????????? FAIL!
hm...
unprocedural pictures are unprocedural
unprocedural pictures are unprocedural
hmm... quite ok.
Mneh..
hmm, looks like a scan by a amiga handy scanner
procedural fail.
Well, naah
technically not impressive but looks really nice
nah...
not too procedural... but hey... why not? =)
A black & white photo in 3k. Nothing impressive here.
nice plasma formula!
no for real is it rle or what?
nope
what wb, Preacher, wiseman and ham said.
nope
fail.
.
.
1-bit low-res upscaled picture does not look serious for PC. I'd say, it maybe worked if it'd be 512b.
!Awesome
hm
favourfaith24@yahoo.com
submit changes
if this prod is a fake, some info is false or the download link is broken,
do not post about it in the comments, it will get lost.
instead, click here !