|
Mandelbrot Rotozoom by Ribbon [web]
[nfo]
|
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||||||
|
popularity : 66% |
|||||||
alltime top: #2074 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
added on the 2006-09-01 03:14:16 by p01  |
||||||||
popularity helper
comments
This quickie ( based on Bonz's code ) works best in Opera and IE.
added on the 2006-09-01 03:16:28 by p01
Why not? :)
:)
Yes, it rotates and zooms.
Why choose innerText over innerHTML? (Since innerHTML is more compatible and takes as many bytes) Only reason I can see to do is if perhaps innerText is a bit faster.
Other than that, It's good for a 253b. (sic)
What Preacher said.
And I agree with p01 of course: link me beautiful
Other than that, It's good for a 253b. (sic)
What Preacher said.
And I agree with p01 of course: link me beautiful
innerText because it's in a PRE tag. Hence I can save 1 byte by using \\n ( the \ has to be escaped because of the main string of the setInterval ) instead of a <br> to get a CRLF.
very very nice
If you replace innerText with innerHTML and do nothing else, it works fine in FF and Opera. That's logic, right? inner means it goes inside of the tag and behaves as if it was actually put between the tags in HTML code.
So, that changes makes it work in FF, makes it still work in Opera, and makes it fuck up in IE (Good thing) So do that change and make it a final. (;
So, that changes makes it work in FF, makes it still work in Opera, and makes it fuck up in IE (Good thing) So do that change and make it a final. (;
:\ ok, innerHTML and innerText are not standard but IE and FF are equally broken there. However since the PRE is not closed, replacing its innerHTML could in theory scalp the SCRIPT tag. InnerText seems safer and more "forward compatible" as it only set the nodeValue of a textNode and do not touch the DOM tree.
Quote:
innerText will in theory do removeChild on all children, appendChild(createTextNode(yourText)) (Abbreviated code) At least as I've understood it.replacing its innerHTML could in theory scalp the SCRIPT tag. InnerText seems safer and more "forward compatible" as it only set the nodeValue of a textNode and do not touch the DOM tree.
Consider you have <div id="bla">Bla<img src="pouet.png""></div> Then you do $("bla").innerText="Something". This will replace every child node with a single text node. You argument is true only for get, not for set.
So innerText is no safer "in theory". Of course both will work in practise because browsers generally store code in some internal format, separated from the DOM tree. Probably even doing manual removeChild on a script node would still leave the script intact. I'll have to check that out.
NICE!
but doesn't work in Firefox 1.5.0.6 :'(
btw, cher poï², is it possible to get an email where i can reach you ? :)
but doesn't work in Firefox 1.5.0.6 :'(
btw, cher poï², is it possible to get an email where i can reach you ? :)
rez: see the discussion above for the gore details. I check my [at]p01.org address and my work address.
doesn't work here
Cool
cruzer: which browser, os ?
Nifty!
Works like a champ in Opera (9) and IE (7) for me.
Works like a champ in Opera (9) and IE (7) for me.
Great.
cute, ASCII.
poi-poi
won't work here :/
Windows XP SP2 latest updates
Firefox 1.5.0.4
[GoogleToolbar 1.0.0.2005110710]
[GoogleSuggest 2.1.20060807W]
[del.ico.us 1.1]
[no themes]
Windows XP SP2 latest updates
Firefox 1.5.0.4
[GoogleToolbar 1.0.0.2005110710]
[GoogleSuggest 2.1.20060807W]
[del.ico.us 1.1]
[no themes]
The original version uses innerText which is IE specific, but also works in Opera. Here's an FF version: link me beautiful
It works fine in FF and Opera (Though faster in Opera, naturally) but renders incorrectly in IE. All I did was replace innerText with innerHTML.
It works fine in FF and Opera (Though faster in Opera, naturally) but renders incorrectly in IE. All I did was replace innerText with innerHTML.
Ok, just click on the icon of your browser:
duh!
duh!
p01: I don't mean to complain, but the files are identical...
:p fixed and checked in ff 1.5.0.6, ff 2.0 b1 and ff 2.0 b2
And damn FF is slow.
And damn FF is slow.
Nice.
very nice
I'd like to thumb it up again because of Firefox fix :) A bit slower but there it is.
nice work
i can finally thumb is up as it runs on FF \o/
seems to be straight cool
nice :)
holy crap Firefox is slow rendering this compared to Opera.
T I: That's old news for anyone who has actually tried using Opera. If it was just about speed, I'd rather use IE, which is faster than FF IMO. But of course I wont do tht for a lot of reasons.
nitro2k01: If IE is a faster browser then FF, then why not use it? The new IE7 is a damn nice browser! I hope it has nothing to do with some anit-microsoft bullshit because then you can start with deleting that windows partiton of yours. ;)
Javascript is really growing fast as a demo platform and I don't know if that is good or bad, but still, runs fast and looks nice!
Javascript is really growing fast as a demo platform and I don't know if that is good or bad, but still, runs fast and looks nice!
When I turned away from IE it was because I wanted more functionality/customizability (Is that a word?) and standards compliance. Maybe IE has gotten better in these areas, maybe not, but I'm happy with what I use, and IE7 would have to better by miles for me to try it. So far I've nothing that would suggest that.
Cool stuff!
awesome what you can fit in so little javascript
impressive
interesting
hah! funl.
nice one, also thumb up for the browser links : )
viva .js :)
Needs less rot and more zoom. Still impressive.
noouch: is it better now ?
p01: it was better before, stop changing it (or atleast keep the old one available too)... people gave their thumbs based on the previous version ;)
Alright. I reverted the files.
Click on the icons below to see the version with less rot and more zoom:
Click on the icons below to see the version with less rot and more zoom:
:( the icon on RIGHT should be FF.
to make sure some #@! don't miss it :\
I improved the v1.1. Now it zooms in and out and have some circular patterns when highly zoomed in ( hey there was 3 bytes left ). Also noticed that it can be 12 bytes smaller in opera :p
:\I improved the v1.1. Now it zooms in and out and have some circular patterns when highly zoomed in ( hey there was 3 bytes left ). Also noticed that it can be 12 bytes smaller in opera :p
p01: t'as cru que c'était la fete du slip ici ou quoi? ;)
Manque plus que Rez s'y mette :)
Manque plus que Rez s'y mette :)
wow, joli p01 :)
Pretty cool! :)
thanks all for the feedback.
keops: ?!
keops: ?!
Kind of cool, but it didn't work in Mozilla v1.7.13 (not Firefox).
Biggest crap i have seen
Ant:[b] the firefox friendly versions work in mozilla 1.7.10 and mozilla 1.7.13. Alas Gecko is slower than in Trident and Presto.
[b]Zplex: yeah sure.
[b]Zplex: yeah sure.
p01: rien, c'etait juste une blague a 2 ballles au sujet de tous les icones de browsers postés :)
ok. Un peu obligé vu les boulets qui sont même pas foutus de lire les commentaires parlant de leurs browser :(
Très bien p01, et cimer pour la version pour FF...
Zplex: C'est une blague ou quoi? Le réalité et toi, vous ne vous entendez pas, n'est-ce pas?
Zplex: C'est une blague ou quoi? Le réalité et toi, vous ne vous entendez pas, n'est-ce pas?
sweet.. especially version 1.1!
cxt: ce n'est pas une plaisanterie
cool
Nice one.
p01 + JavaScript = we are happy
cool
cool, the other one didnt work
Works very well, here!
Works now, wish I could change my thumb down to up... Note to self: Don't thumb down stuff just because it doesn't work.
Oh well, glad you like this tiny prod anyway.
Cool ASCII ;)
rulez
RULEZ.!
and evenmore under Opera...!
and evenmore under Opera...!
totally rulez
awesome, opera is really lucky having you as a javascript coder :)
nicey
haha. Almost works in OWB on OS4 except that for some reason it uses a proportional font :-)
Impressive enough under any supported browser, but it's a true rollercoaster ride under Opera :D. FF3 is a snail even compared to IE7.
Anyway, rulez!
Anyway, rulez!
auch gut.
fucking awesome
"What a surprise."...
... What else ?
... What else ?
Works perfectly in OWB2.12/OS4
slick
Works excellent in Google Chrome :)
i like it!
.
Cool !
funny
cool!
nice!
submit changes
if this prod is a fake, some info is false or the download link is broken,
do not post about it in the comments, it will get lost.
instead, click here !