pouët.net

fix me beautifull

category: general [glöplog]
Well, larstro belongs to the same category (even to the same party), but isn't added to pouet yet. WinRar told me 2 files in that archive are corrupt.
Th dipswitch for fixing prods I had added. I was soooo tired :)
added on the 2005-01-20 10:46:57 by wrthlss wrthlss
keops: how about a 40 orange and a 96 blue?
added on the 2005-01-20 13:10:31 by psenough psenough
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=364

has deadlink.. route to scene.org svp ;)
Fixed, but something is strange there:
It's in the Asm94 results, but can be found in the asm93 demo dir, too. The size of the 93 and the 94 .zip files aren't the same. ps? melwyn?
ps: but these new icons are so bad :((
added on the 2005-01-20 13:45:01 by Gargaj Gargaj
(no offence keops, it's just that i think this type of icons are overcrowded)
added on the 2005-01-20 13:45:30 by Gargaj Gargaj
ps: like that? BB Image

by the way, this 64k icon looks a little bit better imo: BB Image


By the way, some people (gargaj not mention him) complained about the "fugly" icon. I'm not really satisfied with this 64k icon either, but so far very few people helped (p01, Mizc, Kb...). Anyone wishing to help and make better ones is welcome, that will probably be more helpful than some bitching on irc.
added on the 2005-01-20 13:55:16 by keops keops
keops: dark orange... the intro color...
added on the 2005-01-20 14:13:03 by psenough psenough
i dont think the 64 nor the 32 looked ugly at all..
gargaj is just jealous that you can do a decent 6 at first try ;)
added on the 2005-01-20 14:14:06 by psenough psenough
well, it's less readable and design than the previous "i' but I have no other idea...
added on the 2005-01-20 14:16:15 by keops keops
I liked the original "i" better.. perhaps if the color was a bit brighter...
added on the 2005-01-20 14:24:50 by Preacher Preacher
uhm. why did i get redirected to pouet.net/add.php and find myself having the standard onliner-value submitted?
(actually that shouldn't be possible, but you never know =)

i remember that, when i do reconnect to the net i still have pouet open in the browserwindow, that i'm automatically beeing redirected to logout.php, but that one's certainly new =)
added on the 2005-01-20 14:37:29 by dalezr dalezr
Quote:
It seems there is only one 100k on pouet:


nah, this is 100k too (ok, the size is less, but more than 64k, and it was a 100k compo):
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=2589

somebody please fix the wrong "64k" and "64k compo" database entries?
added on the 2005-01-20 14:46:51 by blala blala
madenmann: yeh, it should be asm94, not asm93.. weird indeed ;)
madenmann: even, iirc they (planned to?) release inconexia at asm93 and it is missing in assembly93/
maybe they got mixed up?
http://pouet.net/prod.php?which=3184 (release date was december 2000)

http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=3188 (november 1997)

http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=3189
(april 1997)

http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=3186
(june 1998)

http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=3187
(july 1998)
added on the 2005-01-20 17:02:56 by toxie toxie
Maali: Thx for the info, Inconexia is fixed now, the file is on its way to the asm93-demo directory on scene.org, and we all are happy. :)
prod:
http://www.pouet.net/prod.php?which=15553

belongs to group: http://www.pouet.net/groups.php?which=1346
added on the 2005-01-20 22:53:36 by gloom gloom
gloom (and toxie of course): D*O*N*E
hitchhiker: You won't believe it but: believe it, it's true - fiixed. :)
every amigaprod marked as 64k here: http://www.pouet.net/party.php?which=43&when=94 is in fact 40k..
Which 64k marked amiprods? ;)

login