pouët.net

the 4chan poo

category: general [glöplog]
did you notice basically anything that's an executable goes in the database too.
added on the 2008-10-12 16:46:44 by havoc havoc
All that 4chan crap should be removed from Pouet without hesitation. Its demoscene relevance is 0%.

Pouet.net is a *demoscene* portal, not a generic portal to the whole animated crap produced on the internet.
added on the 2008-10-12 17:12:47 by keops keops
what gayops said
added on the 2008-10-12 17:18:27 by uns3en_ uns3en_
calexico: pouet is more than a bbs with 4chan-esque threads. Now if you want 4chan, I know a place for that, I believe it's called ... 4chan
added on the 2008-10-12 17:18:43 by p01 p01
fuck 4chan and all its progeny
if you guys spent as much effort adding missing prods and commenting on hidden gems as you're obviously spending on analysing 4chan skewed demoscene references we wouldnt even be having this bbs thread O_O
streisand effect anyone?

and yes, i agree some of their animations shouldnt be here, but i feel the otakun demoscene panel invits do belong in here though, since it clearly is demoscene related, even if some of you wouldnt approve of the reference or it could possibly just be a fake joke invit, it was clearly made by someone minimally related to the demoscene with demoscene in mind (even if only for the lulz). the other animations probably dont deserve being here yes, but in doubt i'd rather leave them lost in a corner then play the scalpel cleanup. demoscene is open to anyone after all. last time i checked atleast, i might be out of phase with the rest of scene by now. :S

and yes AYB should begone from database. its just a little gag exception, not the forefather of the downfall. why do you all take this so seriously anyways?
added on the 2008-10-12 17:28:46 by psenough psenough
p01: I think you got it the wrong way...
added on the 2008-10-12 17:32:02 by Calexico Calexico
ps: so basically, you knowingly allow crap to be added to motivate us to add more truely missing prods? how noble of you.
added on the 2008-10-12 17:34:20 by havoc havoc
talk about wrong miss-quoted conclusions :S
added on the 2008-10-12 17:38:14 by psenough psenough
"otakun demoscene panel"? wat?
added on the 2008-10-12 17:38:34 by Gargaj Gargaj
omg, you can spot typos, congrats!!
added on the 2008-10-12 17:41:30 by psenough psenough
I'm pretty sure it was not about the typo.
added on the 2008-10-12 17:42:44 by tomaes tomaes
what typo? o_O
added on the 2008-10-12 17:42:51 by Gargaj Gargaj
At least the 2006 "intro" mentioned a demoscene panel.

Btw, those invitations were done by Coda, who certainly _is_ demoscene-related. That doesn't make those Flash thingies demoscene material that belongs on Pouet, but there definitely is a connection.
added on the 2008-10-12 17:45:45 by Alpha C Alpha C
what alpha c said
added on the 2008-10-12 17:46:29 by psenough psenough
Then, maybe, we should credit those things to coda and not 4chan as a whole.
added on the 2008-10-12 17:48:48 by tomaes tomaes
i was just wondering cos google doesnt really bring up any hits to "otakun demoscene panel" - i wondered how well-established it was, it's certainly establishes my curiousity that someone might be doing overseas outreach
added on the 2008-10-12 17:48:55 by Gargaj Gargaj
i'm not advocating adding all flash joke prods in the world to pouet. im just saying some of these in particular do have demoscene references, which you would know if you'd bother watching them before talking about it. hence i believe they do deserve to be in pouet, even if some of them seem quite demoscene unrelated, it they were made by the same bloke why not let them be on pouet anyways? will pedobear come in dressed as a jazz musician to haunt us? or is it simply because its 4chan, the bastion of anonymous uncensored behavior that you dont like that idea? im sorry, but that sounds like censorship and segregation to me. you're all making way too big deal out of it being on pouet than its worth the attention imho.
added on the 2008-10-12 17:53:03 by psenough psenough
http://www.4chan.org/flash/ says coda also so i added it becouse i remembered he was a scener but the angry moob dosen't seem to agree :(
i must admit that ps has a point about the otakon invites. that said, i still don't see what's demoscene about a flash with c64 cat singing stuff.
added on the 2008-10-12 17:55:19 by skrebbel skrebbel
As for the crediting, Coda did make those things on behalf of 4chan...
added on the 2008-10-12 17:55:35 by Alpha C Alpha C
+1 for ps' open-mindedness!
added on the 2008-10-12 17:56:09 by Zest Zest
gargaj: as mentioned already, even in this thread, otakon is an anime convention. supposedly someone might have tried to set up a demoscene panel there in 2005, 2006 and 2007. im not sure if it ever happened or if its just a 4chan gag, but thats what the invitations seem to indicate. might just well be a demoscene reference lulz afaik.

any otakon attenders active in this joint that can add to this issue? (its kinda weird how little number of anime people are aware of the demoscene actually, would be an interesting corner to outreach, but i guess the japanese demoscene is still too young to go there and tell people about it)
added on the 2008-10-12 17:57:00 by psenough psenough
@sxrebbel: i tought it was ok becouse this was added http://pouet.net/prod.php?which=50425
if this stuff is done by the real coda, rename the group to coda goddamnit and everything will be fine.

login