pouët.net

IQ test results form sceners?

category: general [glöplog]
You rock, I've actually been rated 120 after an official test but always have been lazy to study at school and now I'm struggling to find some good job.

More seriously, talking about IQs is being veryveryvery unhuman.
there are different scales tho!
It's about the beret dood. AND YOU KNOW IT SINCE BP08!
15/33 there just went my dreams out the windows. lol.
added on the 2008-04-03 01:59:16 by hexen hexen
so, do IQ test results form sceners?
added on the 2008-04-03 02:03:00 by stijn stijn
IQ tests are for jazz musicians
added on the 2008-04-03 02:22:47 by micksam7 micksam7
IQ tests are for the gullible.
In my opinion, they should call it a Mystery Quotient.. or a [insert inventor's name here] Quotient... or a Puzzler Fun-time Badge Quotient. That would be more descriptive and take some of the stigma and insanity out of it.
added on the 2008-04-03 04:04:28 by bigcheese bigcheese
IQ tests are bullshit to begin with. Sure, intelligent people tend to do better on them than stupid people, but solving a bunch of puzzles never got anyone nowhere.
added on the 2008-04-03 06:58:00 by Inopia Inopia
i was rated when i was 11 and i still dont know what my score was!!! :-(
added on the 2008-04-03 10:04:11 by skrebbel skrebbel
Remember kids, higher IQ improves your sex life and your partner will be more happier with higher IQ!
added on the 2008-04-03 10:29:04 by waffle waffle
i wish i could buy iq amplifying pills
added on the 2008-04-03 11:02:26 by skrebbel skrebbel
this article is very popular if you mention it to your female co-workers or at the dinner table at home...

added on the 2008-04-03 11:41:01 by prm prm
IQ test for sceners?

IQ test for coders is acceptable but for graphic artists and musicians, EQ test is better I guess.
added on the 2008-04-03 13:18:30 by Skate Skate
what if it was about TRAINING.
Who cares, we're all inferior to Bournemouth anyway
added on the 2008-04-03 13:33:21 by cruzer cruzer
MENSA approves of this thread.
added on the 2008-04-03 13:58:23 by raer raer
To win at IQ tests you have to think like the guys who invented them. Doesn't have much to do with "intelligence", more with flexibility and empathy. What is intelligence anyway?

Is it...
... the processing speed of your brain in MHz?
... how much use your mind is to society?
... the time you need to switch thinking directions?
... how close you are to autism?

"As long as you are able to think you don't know what intelligence really is". That statement doesn't make any sense, but it sounds philosophic :)
added on the 2008-04-03 15:11:33 by simon574 simon574
Well that's the thing, the problem is with the value people place on them as an accurate measure of the worth of someone's mind. Really, all I can see it testing is the flexibility of information processing, the ability to de-contextualize methods of processing information and reuse them in other contexts, in a pretty inflexible environment. IMO, what it's really testing is a certain set of skills and mental processes that may or may not be useful in real world applications. It's pretty good at that, but as the results are weighted based on certain skills, it's a bit of a stretch to consider them the last word on the ability of someone's mind.
is 50 a good or bad result ?
added on the 2008-04-03 15:48:59 by Zweckform Zweckform
50 is good because I hate you.
Quote:
all I can see it testing is the flexibility of information processing, the ability to de-contextualize methods of processing information and reuse them in other contexts

...also known as intelligence ;)
added on the 2008-04-03 15:56:08 by hfr hfr
Quote:
Also I've read some shit about the IQ telling, people with high IQ are not smoking, drinking alcohol or taking any kind of drugs. (yes they stopped living at all. :D)
This seems not very logical to me.


Correlation != causation.
added on the 2008-04-03 16:21:37 by doomdoom doomdoom
Quote:
...also known as intelligence ;)

Well, yeah, but that's not all intelligence is. Changing 1 + 1 = 2 to B = A + A is one technique, but being good at mental arithmetic requires a different set of skills, and both are contenders for inclusion in the consideration of someone's intelligence.
Quote:
but being good at mental arithmetic requires a different set of skills

so true - and that's why mental arithmetic is *not* considered as "intelligence".
added on the 2008-04-03 18:01:37 by hfr hfr

login