|
Scream Tracker 2.2 by Future Crew
[nfo]
|
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||||||
|
popularity : 66% |
|||||||
alltime top: #8605 |
|
|||||||
added on the 2004-12-03 15:55:13 by odex  |
||||||||
popularity helper
comments
September 1990.. yeah.. check the files in the zip.
added on the 2004-12-03 16:18:53 by phoenix 
Well, I've never used this one myself and just thought adding it here when I accidently found the zip file. Didn't actually know about correct releasing date since I didn't even uncompress this one :)
Ok, managed to get it working, made a screenshot and fixed the date.
Now, go and find fasttracker 1. :)
Now, go and find fasttracker 1. :)
Tomaes: ..actually, I happen to have the original Fastracker on a disk. So only if I knew where to upload it I would do it since I've never managed to find it from the web.
urg. fuck this shit :)
ST2 played arpeggios differently btw! Skaven used that in a few of his songs. I've included this "feature" in my little player http://oldschool.voodoofrog.com/
what Dominei said...
OMG, it was buggy, but it WAS! How could we live without it?! :)
I made way too many tunes in this shitty tracker back in the days :)
my first tracker <3
Pales in comparison to all the later trackers :)
I heard good things of this one.
Hideous!
That wasn't free, and this fact isn't really nice for thumb it up. So it's ok.
I really liked scream tracker 2 - it was the tracker I was the most comfortable with.
nah, gathering glöps.
geezez. i did use this back then. didnt remember it was in textmode. anyway it rocked my boat atleast
GEIOILSO!
If you can't make a proper PT compatible tracker then I guess it's ok to invent yet another file format and go with the commands you can pull through :)
Version 2.3 (pre-registered) here is better: http://dcee.net/Files/Music/Player/st_23-r.arj
Legendary version
This got me into producing music, and I still do it to this day.
What set this apart from other trackers was that you didn't have to embed samples in the module files. Instead you could reference samples on disk.
That made it easier to re-use samples between tracks.
I a directory per track, but I could save many versions of a track without needing a lot of disk space.
Funny nowadays, because we're talking kilobytes here; not terabytes.
What set this apart from other trackers was that you didn't have to embed samples in the module files. Instead you could reference samples on disk.
That made it easier to re-use samples between tracks.
I a directory per track, but I could save many versions of a track without needing a lot of disk space.
Funny nowadays, because we're talking kilobytes here; not terabytes.
Quote:
my first tracker <3
lists containing this prod
submit changes
if this prod is a fake, some info is false or the download link is broken,
do not post about it in the comments, it will get lost.
instead, click here !