|
random "what the other guy said" thread |
| category: residue |
|
|
Ok this is it. It just had to be done.
The rules are as follows:
- the first post of any user in this thread has to be a statement (content has to come from somewhere).
- the next posts are just about agreeing with others in the form of "what <xy> said"
- you are only able to agree to a statement - however counter-statements (i state "titan sux" - you state "titan rules!") are allowed if its the users first post in this thread.
- loops are forbidden! you have to be able to follow the "what <xy> said"-chain back to a statement.
- the statement with the most followers wins
- you can of course only agree with a statement and/or a user a single time
- breaking the rules will result in disqualification
as this being my first post here comes my statement:
demoscene.tv seems to be dead and i couldn't care less! |
|
|
|
fuck off to... you know were to! |
|
|
you dont kick a dying horse lying on the floor already, do you ?
demoscene.tv seems to be dead and i wonder when it´ll be up&alive again. |
|
|
|
"what <hardy> said" |
|
|
|
Idiots shouldn't be allowed to post stupid threads. |
|
|
uhm this isnt supposed to be a dtv bashing thread it was just the first best controversial statement that crossed my mind.
i of course meant every poster has to state a new thesis so mog would be out...
but ill make an exception because i should have written "every" and not "any" in rule #1.
also if you think the whole idea is stupid just dont participate (or activate the residue filter). |
|
|
|
*psst* Was a joke, just wondered who'd play along. ;) |
|
|
FAIL /FAIL
DONE /DONE |
|
|
|
what <hardy> said, said. |
|
|
|
I don't think I follow. |
|
|
|
What we need is aristocracy :-) |
|
|
Reloaded. I guess. |
|
|
the idea was good but the pouet not ready yet!
also, what 8-bit buggery said. |
|
|
|
as said. :-) |
|
|
|
what the necrophile said.. |
|
|
|
|
