|
D3D vs. OGL - an article from a developer's perspective |
| category: general |
|
|
It's a good read:
http://www.gamedev.net/reference/articles/article1775.asp |
|
|
|
The article does not tell much - even if you were a beginner. |
|
|
|
2^7 |
|
|
|
... |
|
|
|
Out of date and crap. |
|
|
"Date this article was posted to GameDev.net: 2/24/2002"
'"A Note on Glide", even by 2002-standards he is way out of date :/ |
|
|
|
It's over, d3d won the war. |
|
|
|
d3d won? well, maybe for win users. Not for Mac and Linux ones. |
|
|
oh no, not another d3d vs ogl thread.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0277371/ |
|
|
|
It also won for xbox360 users! :O |
|
|
|
"d3d won? well, maybe for win users. Not for Mac and Linux ones." ... srsly... |
|
|
|
Make love not war! |
|
|
My linux with OpenGL is stronger than your Windows with its DirectX blablabla. Wow, some zealots still fight about that in 2007?
I thought a graphics API was a mean, not an end... |
|
|
|
impulse tracker sucks! |
|
|
|
amigaaah! |
|
|
|
i second cp! AMIGAAAAAH! |
|
|
|
Heidi FTW! :) |
|
|
keops: I agree.. it's the same battles just reworded to whatever the specific thing is..
most people only care about the END result, not how they got there. you can give 1 man a very expensive pro tools rig, another a c64 ... and yet the c64 tune sounds a lot better ;-)
|
|
|
|
to all, watch the date, its a 2001 thread. It was upped by rmeht for being thread number 128 ! |
|
|
krabob: no shit Mr Obvious?!?
The messages were refering to the posts that followed Xphere's |
|
|
|
@skrebbel: IMPULSE TRACKER ROCKS YOU FOOL OMFG JK LOL BBQ!!!ONEELEVEN |
|
|
|
less relevant than ever =) |
|
|
|
Make software rendering not APIs |
|
|
|
src: too much like hard work for todays kiddies |
|
|
|
oh yeh....Amiiiigaaaaaaaaaa! |
|
|
|
|
