128b parallax starfield

screenshot added by 98041634 on 2003-12-12 23:47:46

platform :	MS-Dos MS-Dos
type :	128b 128b
release date :	december 2003

popularity : 61%

61%

0.25

alltime top: #14071

added on the 2003-12-12 23:47:45 by 98041634

popularity helper

increase the popularity of this prod by spreading this URL:

or via: facebook twitter pinterest tumblr bluesky threads

comments

I don't mean to starfield, but I uploaded a 142b starfield and Jazzman said "bah... do it in 128b next time" so I did :o)

btw don't ask for 64b, it won't happen

added on the 2003-12-12 23:50:07 by 98041634

hahaha, excellent attitude :)

rulez added on the 2003-12-13 00:31:23 by Gargaj

didn't pascal do this in 20?

added on the 2003-12-13 00:37:34 by ileaardbei

aw cumon! :o)

added on the 2003-12-13 00:39:06 by 98041634

ile: yep, it's here. I've heard of a 19bytes version too.

added on the 2003-12-13 00:54:16 by p01

wtf, where is your blinking logo?

added on the 2003-12-13 01:18:55 by noname

Wow, that is pretty slick. btw, what blinking logo, what?

added on the 2003-12-13 02:03:31 by 98041634

It's pretty nice. But please don't post each new smaller version to pouet.net. (yes, I'm damn bitter you dropped our prod from the latest prods list! :)

rulez added on the 2003-12-13 11:17:14 by uutee

i feel an awesome power flowing through my hands as i type. well done, man, here's your thumb.

rulez added on the 2003-12-13 18:26:03 by jazzman

Well, that 20 byte starfield didn't look nearly as starfield-ish as this one here, so a thumb. But it does tend to place too many stars in the middle line and flicker at the top...

rulez added on the 2003-12-13 21:27:45 by crusader

You're right - well spotted - the extra code in the original 142b version is responsible for evenly distributing stars and avoiding that slight flicker... :o)

added on the 2003-12-14 01:59:54 by 98041634

128bytes, 64bytes, 1gig, 1byte it doesn't matter cos this looks crap.

sucks added on the 2003-12-14 03:48:11 by Shanethewolf

Well, you may be right - but starfields are nice, and coding anything nice to a 128 byte limit is a perfectly respectable design goal.... If you can do a 128b starfield that looks at all better, or even a 1GB one that looks more than 8 million times better, I'd love to see it.

added on the 2003-12-16 13:55:19 by 98041634

I think a starfield always look more or less the same :)

added on the 2003-12-19 15:54:11 by dEpressio